🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts about that remarks made by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued drought of US male players at the majors: none of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But come on. Suppose Fritz defeated the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a tired Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in press after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world back-to-back. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive power on each front side and backhand are more than adequate to defeat most opponents on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a several dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing drought of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

The American's play in that very quarter-final ought to have been enough of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous service game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and compelled him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Down match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, prepared to not just express his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {